Research

Computational Psychiatry & Decision-making

Other Research Topics

 

Copyright

The documents distributed here have been provided as a means to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work on a noncommercial basis. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders, notwithstanding that they have offered their works here electronically. It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Abstracts

  • doi pdf Don't think, just feel the music: Individuals With Strong Pavlovian-to-instrumental Transfer Effects Rely Less on Model-based Reinforcement Learning
  • Sebold M, Schad DJ, Nebe S, Garbusow M, Jünger E, Krömer N, Kathmann N, Zimmermann U, Smolka M, Rapp MA, Heinz A, Huys QJM
  • J Cogn Neurosci (2016) 28(7):985--995
  • Behavioral choice can be characterized along two axes. One axis distinguishes reflexive, model-free systems that slowly accumulate values through experience and a model-based system that uses knowledge to reason prospectively. The second axis distinguishes Pavlovian valuation of stimuli from instrumental valuation of actions or stimulus-action pairs. This results in a quartet of values and many possible interactions between them, with important consequences for accounts of individual variation. We here explored whether individual variation along one axis was related to individual variation along the other. Specifically, we asked whether individual's balance between model-based and model-free learning was related to their tendency to show Pavlovian interferences with instrumental decisions. In two independent samples with a total of 243 subjects, Pavlovian-instrumental transfer effects were negatively correlated with the strength of model-based reasoning in a two-step task. This suggests a potential common underlying substrate predisposing individuals to both have strong Pavlovian interference and be less model-based, and provides a framework within which to interpret the observation of both effects in addiction.